Provisional Translation
OTO No. | 647 | Classification | MAFF-(4) |
---|---|---|---|
Date of Acceptance | April 5, 2002 | Ministry/Agency Receiving Complaint | Cabinet Office |
Responsible Ministries | Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries | Related Laws | Domestic Animal Infectious Diseases Control Law |
Complainant | Japanese corporation of a foreign corporation | Exporting Countries | The Federal Republic of Germany |
Subject | Prompt cancellation of the import suspension measure for pork and processed pork foods, from Germany, taken against the outbreak of hog cholera | ||
Description of Complaint | 1. Japan had admitted the import of pork, internal organs of pigs, and sausage, ham and bacon made from them from the Federal Republic of Germany on the condition that "there is no outbreak of hog cholera* in Germany (excluding Rhineland -Pfalz) and so on. *An infectious disease prescribed in the Domestic Animal Infectious Diseases Control Law (Article 2) 2. On June 29, 2001, the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries took a measure suspending the import of pork, internal organs of pigs, and the sausages, ham and bacon made from them from Germany until their cleanness has been confirmed in Germany, and a new agreement on hygienic conditions of domestic animals has been concluded, because of the confirmed outbreak of hog cholera in Soltau, Niedersachsen, northern Germany. 3. Meanwhile, outbreaks of hog cholera in Germany (excluding Rhineland -Pfalz) are not chronic. There has been no outbreak observed for more than eight months since the one in June and July 2001 in Niedersachsen etc. up until now (April 4, 2002). 4. If no hog cholera is observed for 40 days (the incubation period of the disease) after the last outbreak in an area, the OIE deems the infection of the area to have died down. In light of this OIE criterion, it is fair to say that cleanness has been confirmed in Germany (excluding Rhineland -Pfalz). 5. In addition, a meeting was held between the complainant and the ministry after the measure, as mentioned in 2. above, was taken, and the complainant was permitted, in July and September 2001, to import only heat-treated sausages by attaching a certificate issued by a governmental organ of Germany etc. stating the products were heat-treated. 6. Incidentally, the United States of America (a country free of hog cholera, which has witnessed no outbreak of hog cholera without the use of the vaccine for it) has not taken such a comprehensive import suspension measure as that of Japan and permits the import of raw ham that has not been heat-treated. 7. Taking the circumstance above into consideration, the ministry should take the following measures. |
||
Details of Measures | The ministry replied as follows: 1. The ministry has been discussing the matter, especially the import of heat-treated pork and sausages, with the hygienic authorities of Germany. On May 28, 2002, the ministry received a scheme for hygienic certificates for domestic animals from Germany. On May 30, 2002, the ministry discussed details of the scheme with the Embassy of Germany. Japan has witnessed no outbreak of hog cholera even in wild animals since 1993, attesting to the cleanness in terms of the disease. The ministry has discontinued, in principle, the inoculation of hog cholera vaccines since October 2000 and has been strengthening preventive measures against the disease. 2. Along with the measures for maintaining cleanness within the country and preventing the disease, the ministry is strengthening preventive measures against the disease from overseas. When there was an outbreak of the disease among wild animals (wild boars) in Austria, Japan suspended the import of pork, etc. from any part of the country. The situation concerning the disease in Germany is very serious: the disease is chronic in Rhineland -Pfalz and there was recently a new outbreak of it in Niedersachsen (Rhotenburg). Germany also witnessed sporadic outbreaks among wild animals (the country's hygienic authorities have not provided Japan with official reports on them). Therefore, if the disease penetrates Japan, which has few pigs that have had the disease's vaccine inoculated, there will be huge damage to the whole livestock industry. The situation concerning the prevention of the disease is changing every moment and is becoming more and more serious. 3. Regretfully, the ministry currently thinks it difficult to take the temporary measure for heat-processed pork considering the circumstances mentioned above, because (1) Japan and Germany are currently discussing conditions focused on heat-processing, (2) international animals hygiene regulations for hog cholera (including standards for heat-processing) were revised at the 70th general meeting of the OIE and the ministry is making inquiries to the OIE about the details of temperature conditions on inactivating the disease, and (3) the two countries agreed to consider the temperature conditions of the OIE regulations at a recent bilateral meeting. 4. The two countries are discussing hygienic requirements for domestic animals concerning heat-processed pork. Although the ministry cannot reveal the content of the discussions since such a revelation could affect future negotiations, it has recognized the demand to incorporate into a new agreement, a statement to the effect that "even if there is a new outbreak of hog cholera in Germany, the ministry will... under certain..." 5. Although the ministry cannot make clear a specific date for the resumption of the import of heat-processed meat, etc. made from pork from Germany, it would like to reach an agreement on hygienic requirements for domestic animals before the end of July to make preparations for the resumption of the import.
<Final Reply> |
||
Classification of Processing | A | Directions | II-a IV |
Remarks | A written reply was made on April 16, 2002. A written reply was made on May 17, 2002. A written reply was made on June 11, 2002. A written reply was made on June 21, 2002. A written reply was made on August 14, 2002. A written reply was made on August 19, 2002. A written reply was made on September 12, 2002. A written reply was made on October 2, 2002. A written reply was made on October 3, 2002. A written reply was made on December 17, 2002. A written reply was made on November 8, 2002. A written reply was made on January 22, 2003. A written reply was made on March 31, 2003. |