Index 
Back Next
Table 1-1-3. Trends in Population of the Aged 65+ by Prefecture
|
(1975) |
(2000) |
(2025) |
| Whole Japan |
7.9 |
17.3 |
27.4 |
| Hokkaido |
6.9 |
18.2 |
30.3 |
| Aomori |
7.5 |
19.5 |
31.0 |
| Iwate |
8.5 |
21.5 |
30.5 |
| Miyagi |
7.7 |
17.3 |
25.0 |
| Akita |
8.9 |
23.5 |
33.8 |
| Yamagata |
10.1 |
23.0 |
29.9 |
| Fukusima |
9.2 |
20.3 |
27.7 |
| Ibaraki |
8.4 |
16.6 |
25.9 |
| Tochigi |
8.3 |
17.2 |
26.4 |
| Gunma |
8.8 |
18.1 |
27.3 |
| Saitama |
5.3 |
12.8 |
24.2 |
| Chiba |
6.3 |
14.1 |
25.8 |
| Tokyo |
6.3 |
15.8 |
29.1 |
| Kanagawa |
5.3 |
13.8 |
25.5 |
| Niigata |
9.6 |
21.3 |
29.0 |
| Toyama |
9.5 |
20.8 |
30.3 |
| Ishikawa |
9.1 |
18.6 |
27.8 |
| Fukui |
10.1 |
20.4 |
28.7 |
| Yamanashi |
10.2 |
19.5 |
25.0 |
| Nagano |
10.7 |
21.4 |
27.0 |
| Gifu |
8.6 |
18.2 |
27.3 |
| Shizuoka |
7.9 |
17.7 |
28.5 |
| Aichi |
6.3 |
14.5 |
25.3 |
| Mie |
9.9 |
18.9 |
26.6 |
| Shiga |
9.3 |
16.1 |
22.8 |
| Kyoto |
9.0 |
17.4 |
27.5 |
| Osaka |
6.0 |
14.9 |
26.9 |
| Hyogo |
7.9 |
16.9 |
26.9 |
| Nara |
8.5 |
16.6 |
26.3 |
| Wakayama |
10.4 |
21.2 |
28.9 |
| Tottori |
11.1 |
22.0 |
29.6 |
| Shimane |
12.5 |
24.8 |
32.4 |
| Okayama |
10.7 |
20.2 |
28.2 |
| Hiroshima |
8.9 |
18.5 |
27.9 |
| Yamaguchi |
10.2 |
22.2 |
33.1 |
| Tokushima |
10.7 |
21.9 |
31.0 |
| Kagawa |
10.5 |
20.9 |
29.6 |
| Ehime |
10.4 |
21.4 |
31.4 |
| Kochi |
12.2 |
23.6 |
32.5 |
| Fukushima |
8.3 |
17.4 |
26.3 |
| Saga |
10.7 |
20.4 |
28.1 |
| Nagasaki |
9.5 |
20.8 |
31.2 |
| Kumamoto |
10.7 |
21.3 |
29.4 |
| Oita |
10.6 |
21.8 |
31.1 |
| Miyazaki |
9.5 |
20.7 |
30.3 |
| Kagoshima |
11.5 |
22.6 |
30.2 |
| Okinawa |
7.0 |
13.8 |
23.3 |
|
 Under 7%
 7% - 13%
 14% - 19%
 20% - 29%
 30% and over
|
|
Source: Year 1975, 2000: Ministry of Management and Coordination, 'Population Census of Japan.' Year 2025: National Institute of Population and Social Security Research, 'Population Projections for Prefecture,' Mar., 2002
Back to Top
Index Back Next
Top Page >
Annual Report on the Aging Society >
Annual Report:2003